Saturday, November 13, 2010

My Desmume Bottom Screen Is Black

The discreet and tireless companion.

This post n º 192 of the Psalter is dedicated to George who is able to see two Venus at a time.

VENUS.



There is a very direct astronomy can be seen with the naked eye. Mainly composed of four stars. There are many others that can also be seen with the naked eye, but only under favorable environmental conditions.

The most immediate of these four is the earth. They say it's a ball, but few people have seen it as such. Although there are many satellite images and it is as if he had seen one. Another star
immediate
day, but not at night, is the Sun can not, or rather not be looking directly because achicharraría a pupil, and then to sell coupons! But you can look with a smoked glass, or the darkest part of an X-ray and in this case is a clear circle. It concludes one that is a sphere. But you do not look at the sun to be an account of its presence because it illuminates everything. And so hot. You do not see at night, but at dusk and dawn can be regarded as perfectly as well take a sesgadito, billet atmosphere they have to cross the sun is considerable, so weaken and dazzle short. One of the great luxuries of life is to swim on a beach in the afternoon and watch the sun ends up diving into the sea that bathes the same one. Well, I know that this is not exactly, but it looks like.

A third star whose vision makes the sun during the day but beautifully decorated night is the moon I'm gonna say that I know not from the Moon!

These three stars have them clearly in mind. But there is a fourth star to anyone, or almost nobody, makes it damn case. Is the planet Venus.

is the Morning Star or Evening Star. Formerly it was believed that there were two distinct stars. It's a fascinating point that I see as a star, with highlights or points. I'm gawking at her. And when the atmosphere is so thick and foul that are hidden from the rest of the stars, Venus looks perfectly.

At that point my light fascinates me, so white and so bright. I showed the other night at my friend George who came for dinner and agreed with the beauty of the evening star, but said there were two.


Two? No one.


Two! Can not you see two?


I did not discuss, because that vision is more subjective than it seems. And I think, moreover, may influence the risk of dinner.


From direct observation I do not see how to get more information, but from reading Wikipedia and other sources.


say it's very similar to Earth in size, density and volume, although is somewhat lower. It has no oceans, but if you have an atmosphere with a very thick layer of clouds that reflect 70% of the light it receives from the Sun is so bright.

But of course, from the ground is always sunny and hot as balls of almost 500 degrees. This is due to the greenhouse effect, because 30% of solar energy absorbed and not released. So that the probes sent to the lithosphere swelter away. The carbon dioxide atmosphere is so warm and clear with no plants thrive to do more breathable atmosphere. No water itself but the clouds are made of sulfuric acid droplets, and rain. That's why Environmentalists have freaked. They see it as the poor sister of the earth: "See? is like Earth but fucked by the greenhouse effect will happen here as well as we change the chip! "

have other oddities like the days are longer than the years. And these slightly shorter than ours. And its orbit is almost a perfect circle, which runs in the opposite direction that Earth and other planets travel in his, so that lift is west and west to the east.

Pictures of the solid surface are a precious gold, but to know the color you really have! You also should not go there to watch. Lithosphere Venus is of volcanic rock that has been almost totally renovated between 300 and 500 million years in geologic terms is nothing! And how could this happen? They think that "every bit" there is a generalized rash and worldwide total, gushing lava, fire, dust and smoke simultaneously through all the cracks and holes that already exist or are formed by the effect of the terrible explosions should be a wonderful show!

Well, like I know what that bright spot of the sky holds, I look enraptured every night.

And it's free!



Saturday, November 6, 2010

Permanent Sore Mouth After Extraction

InfoQ: Bad Code, Craftsmanship, Engineering, and Certification

InfoQ: Bad Code, Craftsmanship, Engineering, and Certification

The author of Clean Code, gives us an excellent presentation on bad code, best practices, craftmanship and certifications, with his customary good humor, about one hour video with slides used in English without subtitles more than recommended

Fondant Shoe Template

organic minimalism.

This post n º 191 of the Psalter is dedicated to Mary.

WABI SABI.




My disciple Jesus Maria, which certainly I will have learned something, I was taught that it matched the WABI-SABI. Putting my hands the famous book by Leonard Koren "Wabi-Sabi for artists, designers, poets and philosophers."

What happens is that what the WAS is said in the first approach to me does not convince me. Because it is often said that beauty is WS imperfect, impermanent and incomplete. Then they say that is typical of this aesthetic of asymmetry, ruggedness, simplicity and innocence, modesty and privacy. If the WS

respond to all that I do not like.

To me what I think is that WAS is organic minimalism.

How will it be imperfect? In all cases, irregular, concluding that the regularity is a geometric quality, and artificial why Is that what occurs naturally is flawed because it does not conform exactly to the geometric morphology? Please!

I guess that means there is "perfect" state in which things are in store. So what can be returned to last in that state. But otherwise not be returned, despite that in another sense "be perfect".


can be rough and asymmetrical, or not. Identify naive simplicity I find, paradoxically, too naive. And both the modesty and privacy may well not come to the case.

A desert landscape seems a perfect example of WS. They are also good examples of WS boulders.




WAS ZEN is bound to not be alarmed, because it is an atheistic religion. And in any case is bound only in the source. And by now the relationship is weak. It also has to do with the tea ceremony and Zen gardens with gravel and stones that are hardly modest because they are simply stunning. WS

are large empty spaces, long silences and subtle damage caused by rust. But what is downright filthy. However, WAS can be in complete compliance with the geometry, because the MUJI brand products seem totally WAS.

Despite his fame, his bad reputation, WAS does not seem sad or not sad but powerful. The aesthetic

WS substances are highly valued, but, paradoxically, have little money. There are estimates or gold or gems. But iron and glass. Silver can be WS, but zinc and tin. Weathered wood, on tablets or sticks. The earth and sand. WAS is an artist, for example, Tapies.

This aesthetic as little luxury is quite unknown in our cultural environment, which is given to grand, monumental, overwhelmingly rich.

And the fact is that here we have opted for the abundance and waste and there is no such luxury for everyone! And yet, we are seized by the desire to eat consumer spending heavily, spending on diet! Living in stores where they are depositing all that is buying, reducing the living space. Piling books could not read even a live one hundred years. Neither one stops to look at his pictures. It is common to have a drawer full pictures machines are becoming more defined. It has TVs getting bigger and flatter.

The recent trip to Lanzarote, which I told you, at least we were in an apartment where there was nothing superfluous and nothing was missing essential so happy!

Much Third World would be fine as is if you leave her alone and just need more to improve their health, but as it dazzles with the aesthetic of abundance and waste, will produce undesirable migration ending in frustration and misery.

But staff at the WAS is not a train fatally lost. Can be retrieved when desired. Enough to hasten what has and has not lost in megalomaniac delusions. The trouble is that the bare minimum is sometimes very difficult to achieve. But paradoxically, it may not have achieved the minimum and be immersed in a lot of brilliant things perfectly useless.