This post n º 191 of the Psalter is dedicated to Mary.
WABI SABI.
My disciple Jesus Maria, which certainly I will have learned something, I was taught that it matched the WABI-SABI. Putting my hands the famous book by Leonard Koren "Wabi-Sabi for artists, designers, poets and philosophers."
What happens is that what the WAS is said in the first approach to me does not convince me. Because it is often said that beauty is WS imperfect, impermanent and incomplete. Then they say that is typical of this aesthetic of asymmetry, ruggedness, simplicity and innocence, modesty and privacy. If the WS
respond to all that I do not like.
To me what I think is that WAS is organic minimalism.
How will it be imperfect? In all cases, irregular, concluding that the regularity is a geometric quality, and artificial why Is that what occurs naturally is flawed because it does not conform exactly to the geometric morphology? Please!
I guess that means there is "perfect" state in which things are in store. So what can be returned to last in that state. But otherwise not be returned, despite that in another sense "be perfect".
can be rough and asymmetrical, or not. Identify naive simplicity I find, paradoxically, too naive. And both the modesty and privacy may well not come to the case.
A desert landscape seems a perfect example of WS. They are also good examples of WS boulders.
WAS ZEN is bound to not be alarmed, because it is an atheistic religion. And in any case is bound only in the source. And by now the relationship is weak. It also has to do with the tea ceremony and Zen gardens with gravel and stones that are hardly modest because they are simply stunning. WS
are large empty spaces, long silences and subtle damage caused by rust. But what is downright filthy. However, WAS can be in complete compliance with the geometry, because the MUJI brand products seem totally WAS.
Despite his fame, his bad reputation, WAS does not seem sad or not sad but powerful. The aesthetic
WS substances are highly valued, but, paradoxically, have little money. There are estimates or gold or gems. But iron and glass. Silver can be WS, but zinc and tin. Weathered wood, on tablets or sticks. The earth and sand. WAS is an artist, for example, Tapies.
This aesthetic as little luxury is quite unknown in our cultural environment, which is given to grand, monumental, overwhelmingly rich.
And the fact is that here we have opted for the abundance and waste and there is no such luxury for everyone! And yet, we are seized by the desire to eat consumer spending heavily, spending on diet! Living in stores where they are depositing all that is buying, reducing the living space. Piling books could not read even a live one hundred years. Neither one stops to look at his pictures. It is common to have a drawer full pictures machines are becoming more defined. It has TVs getting bigger and flatter.
The recent trip to Lanzarote, which I told you, at least we were in an apartment where there was nothing superfluous and nothing was missing essential so happy!
Much Third World would be fine as is if you leave her alone and just need more to improve their health, but as it dazzles with the aesthetic of abundance and waste, will produce undesirable migration ending in frustration and misery.
But staff at the WAS is not a train fatally lost. Can be retrieved when desired. Enough to hasten what has and has not lost in megalomaniac delusions. The trouble is that the bare minimum is sometimes very difficult to achieve. But paradoxically, it may not have achieved the minimum and be immersed in a lot of brilliant things perfectly useless.
are large empty spaces, long silences and subtle damage caused by rust. But what is downright filthy. However, WAS can be in complete compliance with the geometry, because the MUJI brand products seem totally WAS.
Despite his fame, his bad reputation, WAS does not seem sad or not sad but powerful. The aesthetic
WS substances are highly valued, but, paradoxically, have little money. There are estimates or gold or gems. But iron and glass. Silver can be WS, but zinc and tin. Weathered wood, on tablets or sticks. The earth and sand. WAS is an artist, for example, Tapies.
This aesthetic as little luxury is quite unknown in our cultural environment, which is given to grand, monumental, overwhelmingly rich.
And the fact is that here we have opted for the abundance and waste and there is no such luxury for everyone! And yet, we are seized by the desire to eat consumer spending heavily, spending on diet! Living in stores where they are depositing all that is buying, reducing the living space. Piling books could not read even a live one hundred years. Neither one stops to look at his pictures. It is common to have a drawer full pictures machines are becoming more defined. It has TVs getting bigger and flatter.
The recent trip to Lanzarote, which I told you, at least we were in an apartment where there was nothing superfluous and nothing was missing essential so happy!
Much Third World would be fine as is if you leave her alone and just need more to improve their health, but as it dazzles with the aesthetic of abundance and waste, will produce undesirable migration ending in frustration and misery.
But staff at the WAS is not a train fatally lost. Can be retrieved when desired. Enough to hasten what has and has not lost in megalomaniac delusions. The trouble is that the bare minimum is sometimes very difficult to achieve. But paradoxically, it may not have achieved the minimum and be immersed in a lot of brilliant things perfectly useless.
0 comments:
Post a Comment