Remember the fight against the Mafia police? Textile Project In November last year broke the issue of police mafias Mendoza. As we know, this is systematic, is one of the many abuses committed by the system and it is intrinsic. Criminalize, tortured those who do not want to work for the fatal police business. State's armed forces deal with the life of the people, exploit the oppressed with coercion. The exploited and people that are in situations vulnerable social social are the customary white point at which weapons of injustice and abuse of power. The power and coercion hierarchy need to maintain "order" effect: the injustice of the capitalist system, beyond its political variations. This is not an exceptional case, but there are many people who speak against it and few of them act accordingly and, ultimately, have the will, consciousness and commitment required struggle and social change .
is why we want to show what happened after the complaint was Ricardo Ferreyra bravely, facing the power and the media, mostly in opposition to government Jaque, demonstrate so emphatically. Do not celebrate the court decision was the case, but we highlight the fighting spirit of comrade who put his life at stake to make this claim (with a bit of memory, was also in the fight with prisoners of Hall 3 of the Criminal Boulogne Sur Mer few years ago)
Against the State and capital. Against all forms of hierarchy.
against abuses of power and persecution of protest discussion, dissemination, organization and control ! Viva Anarchy! the jury will be asked for a local prosecutor accused of "assembling" a cause for murder These Fernando Giunta. Complex Crimes Prosecutor Claudia Rios found sufficient evidence to understand that participated actively to invent witnesses, planting evidence and to charge and imprison a person for murder. Giunta was on the court look after a remorseful witness confirmed that he was forced to testify in the case brought by the death of Marcos Cardoso. From now on, the fate of tax-Maipú Luján Fernando Giunta depend on their political contacts to disengage from the process of jury trial for removal. As regards the criminal case against him there, the Complex Crimes Prosecutor Claudia Rios will sign in the coming hours will decree established that there are sufficient grounds for Giunta is accused of forging a cause, invent witnesses take these data as certain to send a person to jail and charged by homicide.
Giunta court was in the spotlight after a repentant witness confirmed that he was forced to testify in the case brought by the death of Marcos Cardoso. Reported that he was instigated to say he had seen and who had killed the boy on August 19 last year. That plan had been prepared by the magistrate, Effective Police Station 11 and members of the Criminal Intelligence Directorate reporting directly to Carlos Ciurca, who in those days served as security minister.
The "Cardoso case" was not one, not to or for Ciurca Giunta. The course was beyond clarification to the public prosecutor and "crowned" the Security Ciurca output. And so, they silenced the voices that had begun to question the upsurge of crime in the province.
The witness in question was Ricardo Ferreyra, a former inmate who had been accused by Giunta in a robbery, then released and subsequently converted by the same prosecutor's key witness something you never saw.
Giunta The complaint against the policemen and was instructed by the prosecutor Claudia Rios. One of his first acts was to make an inspection at the place where, according to the witness's statement false, Cardoso had embarked on a water channel. From then on, the cause remained the only possible way.
The expertise determined that the witness lied, that from the position at which said it had been impossible to see anything and it was all part of the same fabricated story. A few days later, the complaint against three police officers from the Police 11 confirmed the predictions.
Once the cops out of play The prosecutor asked Rivers Chamber directives Felipe Seisdedos. The evidence was concrete and had more than one reason to doubt the power of Fernando Giunta as head of the investigation into the death of Cardoso.
Falling Seisdedos line cleared all doubts. Rivers instructed to arrogate to his colleague and comply with the formal requirements for such a charge and the request for impeachment. Now, the last word, will be among the members of the jury.
Source:
http://www.mdzol.com/mdz/nota/237672 (permanent link)
The news was covered in major newspapers of Mendoza. Then related links:
http://www.diariouno.com.ar/edimpresa/2010/09/15/nota253314.html http://www.losandes.com.ar/notas/2010/9/
15/acusar-fiscal-giunta-armar-causa-514918.asp Here is a brief explanation of the complicated situation of Giunta. Cardozo Case: why each time further complicates the future of fiscal Giunta
In the last few hours, two private plaintiffs attorneys filed a brief with the Complex Crimes Prosecution requesting a subpoena to testify unsworn, upon complaint for crimes criminal prosecutor Fernando Giunta Instruction under the case on the death of Marcos Cardozo. After the judicial complaint made on some police and witnesses aside under dossier investigating the death of the young Marcos Cardozo, the prosecuting attorneys Alejandro Acosta and Carlos Varela Álvarez-counsel of the latter Ervidia Ricardo Ferreyra, "presented a letter to the Attorney complex crimes in which they request to be "summoned to testify unsworn, upon complaint of criminal offenses, the prosecutor Fernando Giunta Baglini Instruction," due to its actions in the court case of yore.
addition, the lawyers requested in order that, citing time to provide a statement from a judicial officer, "be referred back the case to the Honorable Jury Procedure of our province, for this Authority to assess the evidence in the cause and determine the responsibilities of its power to where it can be treated as a man and citizen (Article 16 and 17 of Law 6730). "
There, referring to the statement Ervidia Ricardo Ferreyra, who on November 9, 2009, reported that "three days after he regained his freedom in a case also taught by Dr. Giunta Baglini in the Fiscal Unit Lujan, was visited in the morning by a policeman who would later be identified as a barrier and a civilian named Ricardo Acosta. These people indicated that they would witness a case where it is investigating the death of a child, Marcos Cardozo and why some people were detained, including one dubbed "Panaline." Ferreyra tells him that intimidated because it was true what was said (now unfortunately proven fact), and then was taken to the police station in Luján, where he was interviewed by other police and the prosecutor Fernando Baglini Giunta. "
Referrals officials would have led to a room where he would have to sign a statement "armada" theme culminating in a telephone call Giunta made by the then Security Minister Carlos Ciurca, assuring that the case was resolved.
Finally, the presentation requesting specific testing measures and ensures that it is proven "that the prosecutor Giunta was aware of everything." In this regard, there is a pithy paragraph referred to the judicial officer "(Giunta) approved and deployed, implemented and used in a personal and selfish perjury. He was also manager of the illegal charges by the police informant Ricardo Acosta, thus becoming co-author with the other defendants for crimes under Articles The 5th subsection 174 (aggravated fraud), 275 Part II (aggravated perjury), 293 (forgery of public documents), and the author of the fraud trial now scheduled in the same body 172 of the Substantive Criminal. "
The scandal has overtaken the media, the word is now law.
Here the source and the full court filing:
http://www.mdzol.com/mdz/nota/203672